| “It was the best seminar that I have ever attended.” |
| |
- participant from the United States |
| “The seminar has been conducted on an extremely high level
by competent speakers. It well combined theoretical lectures with the practical
experience of the speakers.” |
| |
- participant from Central Europe |
|
“The great success of the seminar lies in the huge amount of information provided.” |
|
- participant from the Peoples Republic of China |
|
“The judges highly recommend the International Judicial Academy for programs of training in the judicial/legal area.” |
|
- Report of judges from Thailand to the U.S. Embassy, Bangkok |
|
“Excellent organization. Great level and quality of professors. This course is highly recommended.” |
|
- participant from Argentina |
|
| “What I liked – that the organizers stuck to the schedule,
transport, visits with an excellent punctuality. The topics were of great
interest. Washington, DC is wonderful. The interpreters were excellent. The
number of participants was very appropriate.” |
| |
- participant from Chile |
| “Everything was fantastic. Thank you very much for this
tremendous educational experience.” |
| |
- participant from the United States |
| “These two weeks have been the most enriching and touching
experience of our lives.” |
| |
- Testimonial letter from group of
Romanian magistrates |
“I liked the seminar because the whole structure was highly
well organized and planned. Very rich on information relating to both the
general and the specific.” |
| |
- participant from Central Europe |
| “Everything was very well-executed and I am sincerely
grateful for having participated.” |
| |
- participant from Argentina |
| “The quality of the speakers and their amiability were of
excellent levels.” |
| |
- participant from Chile |
| “I liked the variety of presentations, the location
(Strasbourg), Baden – Baden in Germany, the atmosphere of the seminar, and most
importantly, the substance of the presentations.” |
| |
- participant from the United States |
| “Extremely well-organized seminar. Hit on all the key issues
in the IP area. Very informative. Interpreters were excellent.” |
| |
- participant from Latin America |
| “The organization of the seminar was excellent. The topics
were really interesting. The seminar has provided many different topics to
study in the future and in addition the seminar gave me inspiration to better
organize my work and the work of the courts.” |
| |
- participant from Argentina |
| “Flawless organization; high quality content of
presentations; the presenters were extremely good speakers.” |
| |
- participant from Romania |
| “Outstanding, in-depth presentations about relevant aspects
of human rights law. Very effective to be in the very buildings and rooms of
the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the Council of Europe. A good
mix of participants from around the country. Very exciting to meet the
President of the ECHR.” |
| |
- participant from the United States |
| “Most of the speakers are excellent, and we have gained lots
of information on the legal systems and U.S. intellectual property law. The
program is really rewarding.” |
| |
- participant from the Peoples
Republic of China |
| “The speakers were very well prepared; they bought good
written materials or by electronic means; they gave us the current situation
and in-time developments of problems and the solutions to these problems.” |
| |
- participant from Romania |
| “Excellent organization. Good choice of subjects. The
multi-faceted presentation of the subjects has helped us understand the issues
and factors in the successful and less-than-successful implementation of
information technology in the justice system.” |
| |
- participant from Romania |
| “What I liked about the seminar were the good speakers,
visits, interesting subjects and interaction between attendees and speakers.” |
| |
- participant from Latin America |
| “I liked the seminar because of the combination of field
trips and classrooms. It helped me to better understand the role of the judge
in the transitional period [in a country's life] and, as a decision maker, the
judge's involvement in insuring the quality of all aspects that relate to his
work and the image of authority he represents.” |
| |
- participant from Romania |
